USPTO serial 76675545
RICOH GELJET PRINTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RICOH GELJET PRINTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter D Murray
Peter D Murray Cooper & Dunham LLP30 Rockefeller Plaza 20th FloorNew York, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | FILLED TONER CARTRIDGE FOR USE IN COPYING MACHINES, FACSIMILE MACHINES, PRINTING MACHINES AND PRINTER | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | PRINTERS, NAMELY, COMPUTER, LASER, LASER COLOR, INK-JET, IMPACT, DOT MATRIX AND BUBBLE-JET PRINTERS, AND PARTS THEREFOR AND ACCESSORIES AND PERIPHERALS FOR USE THEREWITH, NAMELY, PRINTER CONTROLLERS, WIRELESS LAN BOARDS FOR PRINTER CONTROLLERS, PRINTER DRIVERS, DOWNLOADABLE FONTS FOR COMPUTER PRINTERS, INTERFACE CABLES, NETWORK INTERFACE BOARD, SOFTWARE FOR USE IN OPERATING PRINTERS, INK CARTRIDGES, PAPER FEEDERS, PAPER CASSETTES, SORTERS, STACKERS AND UNIT TO ENABLE PRINTING ON BOTH SIDES OF PAPER; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE WHICH STORES, RETRIEVES, PRINTS, SENDS, DISTRIBUTES, IMPORTS AND EXPORTS DOCUMENT FILES FOR MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTS FROM DOCUMENT VIA SCANNER TO IMAGE DOCUMENT ON A COMPUTER NETWORK, UNFILLED INK AND PRINTER RIBBON CARTRIDGES FOR PHOTOCOPY MACHINES OR COMPUTER PRINTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ricoh Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Ricoh Company, Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named RICOH GELJET PRINTER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 8, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |