USPTO serial 76675626
NET+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NET+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Douglas, GB
DOUGLAS, GB
DOUGLAS, GB
DOUGLAS, ISLE OF MAN, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessie K. Reider, CA Bar No. 237,113
Jessie K. Reider, CA Bar No. 237,113 Buchalter Nemer, A Professional Corporation1000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1500Los Angeles, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CREDIT AND CHARGE CARDS ELECTRONICALLY ENCODED OR WITH MAGNETIC CODING FOR OWNERS OF ELECTRONIC MONEY ACCOUNTS; DEBIT CARDS ELECTRONICALLY ENCODED OR WITH MAGNETIC CODING, FOR OWNERS OF ELECTRONIC MONEY ACCOUNTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | CREDIT AND CHARGE CARDS, WITHOUT MAGNETIC CODING, FOR OWNERS OF ELECTRONIC MONEY ACCOUNTS; DEBIT CARDS, WITHOUT MAGNETIC CODING, FOR OWNERS OF ELECTRONIC MONEY ACCOUNTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | PAYMENT CARD SERVICES, PRE-PAID CARD SERVICES AND STORED-VALUE CARD SERVICES, NAMELY, CARD SERVICES ONLY FOR OWNERS OR INTERNET-BASED, ON-LINE ACCESSIBLE, ELECTRONIC MONEY ACCOUNTS, WHEREBY A PAYMENT CARD, PRE-PAID CARD, OR STORED-VALUE CARD IS USED TO PURCHASE GOODS AND SERVICES FROM PHYSICAL MERCHANTS AND ON-LINE MERCHANTS, ALL FUNDS USED IN SUCH PURCHASES BEING DEBITED FROM THE USER'S ELECTRONIC MONEY ACCOUNT; VIRTUAL CARD SERVICES ONLY FOR OWNERS OF INTERNET-BASED, ON-LINE ACCESSIBLE, ELECTRONIC MONEY ACCOUNTS WHEREBY A COMPUTER PROGRAM PROVIDES THE CONSUMER WITH A VIRTUAL PAYMENT CARD HAVING A ONE-USE-ONLY PAYMENT CARD NUMBER, FOR USE IN PURCHASING GOODS AND SERVICES ON-LINE, BY MAIL, AND BY TELEPHONE, ALL FUNDS USED IN SUCH PURCHASES BEING DEBITED FROM THE USER'S ELECTRONIC MONEY ACCOUNT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Neteller plc
- Other trademarks owned by NEOVIA FINANCIAL PLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEOVIA FINANCIAL PLC
- Other trademarks owned by OPTIMAL PAYMENTS PLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named NET+
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 31, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2010 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 16, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |