USPTO serial 76676069
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Ottaviani
John E. Ottaviani Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge, LLPFDR StationPO BOX 130New York, NY 10150| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting to software product developers in the fields of product innovation, new market creation, just in time delivery, application study and advice, application portfolio rationalization, enterprise application roadmap development, concept analysis, market research, investment advisory services, domain / business modeling, industrial design, user interface design, product design, product development, independent verification and validation, IP procurement and protection, branding and marketing, call center and data center services; assistance, advisory services and consultancy with regard to business planning, business analysis, business management, business transformation enablement and business organization | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 16, 2007 |
| 042 | Computer software design and development for others; computer software consultancy; computer software application services, namely, computer software design, computer programming,computer software maintenance, and periodic upgrading of software, in the nature of application re-alignment, platform up grade, legacy application modernization, application delivery models expansion in the fields of network, ASP, SaaS, embedded, mobile applications, open source application development and quality improvement of software, re-engineering of existing products and applications for enhanced functionality and cost efficiency, and early adoption of new delivery models; corrective software maintenance in the fields of defects and emergency fixes, perfective software maintenance in the field of enhancements,adaptive software maintenance in the fields of upgrades and migrations, preventative software maintenance in the fields of capacity planning, availability management, and service continuity; software customization, implementation, integration, migration, and maintenance; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of software problems; computer consultation, namely, advisory services for the software industry in the fields of product development, application development, product lifecycle management, software as a service (SaaS) enablement, and business collaboration portals; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software which provides an automated framework to build software applications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 16, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |