USPTO serial 76676280
CHANDRA. BEAUTIFUL...NATURALLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHANDRA. BEAUTIFUL...NATURALLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kay Lyn Schwartz
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 Elm Street, Suite 3000IP SECTIONDallas, TX 75201-4761Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body and beauty care cosmetics; cosmetics; lip balms and creams; hair care preparations, namely, shampoos, conditioners, gels, mousses, lotions and creams; and skin care products, namely, cleansers, moisturizers, toners, exfoliates, soaps, creams and masks; skin care and bath products for infants and children, namely, moisturizers, creams, gels, nonmedicated cream for diaper rash, bath powders, shampoo, and oils; incense and incense sticks; aromatherapy products, namely, creams, lotions, oils and pillows comprising potpourri in fabric containers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Natural Wellness USA, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Natural Wellness USA, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named CHANDRA. BEAUTIFUL...NATURALLY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |