USPTO serial 76676288
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Brooklyn, NY
Brooklyn, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie E. Kretzschmer
Julie E. Kretzschmer Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP38500 Woodward Avenue, Suite 100Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | PRE-PACKAGED PASTA MEALS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |