USPTO serial 76676362
ENLIVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENLIVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sacramento, CA
Sacramento, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark C. Jacobs
MARK C. JACOBS Law Office of Mark C. Jacobs, Esq.3033 EL CAMINO AVESACRAMENTO, CA 95821-6014UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, jackets, blouses, pants, shorts, travel shoes; UV light protective clothing for adults and children, namely, t-shirts, pants, shorts, jackets, coats, scarves,vests, gloves, sport vests, and footwear | ACTIVE | Jul 6, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 8, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 19, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |