USPTO serial 76676380
GOLF CONSCIENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GOLF CONSCIENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kay Lyn Schwartz
KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM STREETIP SECTION, SUITE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-4761Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software application used to customize golf strategies for particular golf courses; and hand held electronic device containing applications for golf strategies for particular golf courses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |