USPTO serial 76676618
COCO LOCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COCO LOCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Catarina, Nuevo León, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore A. Breiner
THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER LLCPO BOX 320160ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-0160UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit Juices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 15, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |