USPTO serial 76676675
STREETSMART AUTOMATED PARKING SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STREETSMART AUTOMATED PARKING SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. J. Lasker
R. J. LASKER Intellectual Property Law Firm of R. J.1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1445UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Vehicle parking and management systems, composed of coin-operated gates for car parking facilities, electronic parking lot ticket dispensers and parking meters; vehicle detection and sensing systems for car parking facilities composed of proximity sensors, cameras containing linear image sensors; electronic parking meters; communications for parking systems, namely, telephones and video terminals; parking information systems and parking control and command centers composed of proximity sensors, wireless electronic transmitters and receivers for indicating the presence or absence of parked vehicles, communication computers, flat panel display screens; automated parking solutions, namely, automated parking meters | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Parking lot services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovapark, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Innovapark, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named STREETSMART AUTOMATED PARKING SOLUTIONS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 19, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2009 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |