USPTO serial 76676995
CHEFS WHITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHEFS WHITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wendy J. Pifher
WENDY J. PIFHER Holland & Hart LLPPO BOX 8749DENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | KITCHENWARE AND HOUSEHOLD UTENSILS, NAMELY, KNIVES, FORKS, SPOONS; CAN OPENERS; TABLE CUTLERY, NAMELY KNIVES, FORKS, SPOONS, AND STEAK KNIVES; SILVERWARE, NAMELY KNIVES, FORKS, SPOONS AND STEAK KNIVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PAPER TABLECLOTHS, PAPER TABLE RUNNERS, PAPER NAPKINS, PAPER TOWELS, PAPER PLACEMATS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | DINNERWARE AND SERVING UTENSILS; COOKWARE, NAMELY, SERVING TONGS, HAND-OPERATED FOOD GRINDERS, POTS, PANS, GRILLS; BAKEWARE, NAMELY BAKING DISHES, CAKE PANS, LOAF PANS, PIE PANS AND BAKING SHEETS; HOUSEWARES, NAMELY, BASKETS OF WICKER, RATTAN, SEAGRASS; CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD AND KITCHEN USE NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, AND FABRIC BASKETS; MOPS, GARBAGE CANS MADE OF METAL AND PLASTIC MATERIALS, BROOMS, AND DUSTERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | TABLE LINENS, TABLECLOTHS NOT OF PAPER, FABRIC TABLE RUNNERS, FABRIC NAPKINS, TOWELS, OVEN MITTS, PLACEMATS NOT OF PAPER | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |