USPTO serial 76677002
CLONEME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLONEME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI Kozlowski & Company5065 Forest Hill DriveMississauga, Ontario L5M 5A7,CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for the transmission of video images over the internet; computer software for receiving video images over the internet; computer software for displaying video images over the internet; computer software for the streaming of video material over the internet; computer software for displaying on web sites video images received over the internet; computer software for receiving video images over the internet and automatically displaying the video images on web sites when viewed by others; computer software for linking to web pages on the internet; computer software for automatically initiating e-mail messages; computer software for creating audio and video e-mail messages; computer software for hosting the playing of audio and video e-mail messages; and computer software for distributing audio and video e-mail messages | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | photography; on-line photography; photography reproduction services; the recording of video images; transmission of video images over the internet; receiving video images over the internet; the streaming of video material over the internet; displaying on web sites video images received over the internet; receiving video images over the internet and automatically displaying the video images on web sites when viewed by others; providing links to other web pages; initiating e-mail messages; creating audio and video e-mail messages; hosting the playing of audio and video e-mail messages; and distributing audio and video e-mail messages | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |