USPTO serial 76677148
SPINAL ARTHROSCOPY CENTER OF N.Y. & N.J.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3396608Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 2008
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPINAL ARTHROSCOPY CENTER OF N.Y. & N.J.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hoboken, NJ
New York City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell P. Novick, Esq.
Mitchell P. Novick, Esq. Law Offices Of Mitchell P. Novick623 Eagle Rock AvenueSuite 407West Orange, NJ 07052Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | health and medical services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 14, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 11, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |