USPTO serial 76677227
ECO HET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3747101Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 9, 2010
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECO HET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NIAGARA CONSERVATION CORPORATION
Flower Mound, TX
NIAGARA CONSERVATION CORPORATION
Cedar Knolls, NJ
NIAGARA CONSERVATION CORPORATION
Cedar Knolls, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
S. Roxanne Edwards
S. Roxanne Edwards Klemchuk LLP8150 North Central Expressway10th FloorDallas, TX 75206Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | SANITARY WARE, AND WATER AND ENERGY CONSERVATION PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FAUCETS, SHOWER HEADS, TOILETS, SINKS, FAUCET AERATORS, AND FAUCET SPRAYERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NIAGARA CONSERVATION CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NIAGARA CONSERVATION CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by NIAGARA CONSERVATION CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named ECO HET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |