USPTO serial 76677291
ENGINE FLUSH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENGINE FLUSH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I. ROZSA ROZSA LAW GROUP LC18757 BURBANK BLVD STE 220TARZANA, CA 91356-3346UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES FEATURING AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE FLUSHING MACHINES, PARTS THEREFOR, AND CHEMICAL FLUSHES FOR AUTOMOTIVE ENGINE FLUSHING MACHINES | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |