USPTO serial 76677920
SYNAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYNAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Baxley
Charles E. Baxley Hart, Baxley, Daniels & Holton90 John StreetSuite 309New York, NY 10038-3243Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | WE ARE A SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. WE SELL AND SUPPPORT OUR PRODUCT, A MODULAR BUINESS SYSTEM CALLED "SYNAP" | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |