USPTO serial 76678142
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational Philanthropy services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2009 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |