USPTO serial 76678415
THE BREAK-UP KIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4057867Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 22, 2011
- Examiner
- FRUM MILONE, MARCIE R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THE BREAK-UP KIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario L4W 1T7, CA
Mississauga, Ontario L4W 1T7, CA
Mississauga, Ontario L4W 1T7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria v. Hardison
Maria v. Haridson Tassan & Hardison4143 27th Street N.Arlington, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Kits in the nature of gift baskets and other containers, namely, gift boxes, gift bags and bowls, all sold as a unit, primarily containing bubble baths, cosmetics, body and skin care lotions, scented bath beads and also containing facial tissues, computer game software, prerecorded DVDs and CDs featuring music, candy, popcorn, chocolate, hot chocolate mixes, pictures, note pads, pencils, pens, books in the nature of fiction and self-help books, drink mix guides, travel guides, journals, diaries, matches, candles, mugs, die, wash cloths, blankets, slippers, sleeping masks, wines, liquor, artificial flowers, pedometers, dart boards, and figurines of common metal, paper mache, rubber, clay, fabric plaster, plastic, wood, ceramic, earthenware, glass, porcelain, terra cotta, molded plastic, and resin | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |