USPTO serial 76678568
COMFORTMAXX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMFORTMAXX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Famiglio
ROBERT B. FAMIGLIO FAMIGLIO & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 1999MEDIA, PA 19063-8999UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | New and replacement windows for buildings, namely, vinyl windows for use in residential and commercial new construction or as replacement window units | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |