USPTO serial 76680512
X FIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with X FIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Coral Springs, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Myron Amer
Myron Amer Myron Amer, P.C.350 National BlvdSuite 2BLong Beach, NY 11561-3327Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | athletic apparel, namely, sweatshirts and sweatpants, except t-shirts, sportswear and footwear for sports | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 12, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 24, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 28, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |