USPTO serial 76681655
SPECIFIED TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPECIFIED TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Kane
JOHN J. KANE SPERRY, ZODA & KANE1 HIGHGATE DR STE DTRENTON, NJ 08618-2030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | GLAZIER'S PUTTY USED FOR FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTAINMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 002 | SEALER COATINGS USED FOR FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTAINMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | MECHANICAL SEALS USED FOR FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTAINMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | SILICONE AND URETHANE FOAM MATERIAL USED FOR FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTAINMENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | MORTARS USED FOR FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTAINMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Specified Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Specified Technologies Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named SPECIFIED TECHNOLOGIES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |