USPTO serial 76685911
ONE 1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONE 1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Tustin, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chris Papageorge
14625 S VERMONT AVE APT 5GARDENA, CA 90247-2612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FULL LINE OF CLOTHING, NAMELY, WOMEN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, HEADWEAR, FOOTWEAR, PANTS, SHIRTS, DRESSES, HATS, OUTERWEAR, AND UNDERWEAR, BOY'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, HEADWEAR, FOOTWEAR, PANTS, SHIRTS, HATS, OUTERWEAR AND UNDERWEAR, BABY'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, HEADWEAR, FOOTWEAR, PANTS, SHIRTS, BIB OVERALLS, OUTERWEAR AND UNDERWEAR AND BABY'S SWIMWEAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |