USPTO serial 76688608
FIREJEWEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIREJEWEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey E. Jacobson
JEFFREY E. JACOBSON JACOBSON & COLFIN, P.C.60 MADISON AVE STE 1026NEW YORK, NY 10010-1666UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | jewelry | ACTIVE | Mar 25, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |