Drawing for RYTHMIQ

USPTO serial 76690642

RYTHMIQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RYTHMIQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas J. Nikolai

THOMAS J. NIKOLAI NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU, P.A.900 Second Avenue South, Suite 820Minneapolis, MN 55402-3813UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Feature of an implantable heart pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator that eliminates unnecessary ventricular pacingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 12, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 12, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 27, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Apr 20, 2010EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Dec 23, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Dec 22, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Nov 6, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 9, 2009RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Sep 9, 2009CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Sep 1, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 1, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 1, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Aug 14, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 14, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 27, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 2, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 10, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 9, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 28, 2008MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 24, 2008NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance