USPTO serial 76693105
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alyssa Ann Finamore
ALYSSA ANN FINAMORE DOWELL & DOWELL, P.C.103 ORONOCO STREETSUITE 220ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed educational materials in the fields of nutraceuticals, age management, and regenerative medicine | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, providing seminars in the fields of nutraceuticals, age management, and regenerative medicine | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Providing information about nutraceuticals for health purposes, age management for health purposes, and regenerative medicine | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 23, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 22, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |