CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CENTURYLINK

USPTO serial 76697610

CENTURYLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CENTURYLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gretchen L. Testerman

Gretchen L. Testerman CenturyLink1801 California Street, Suite 900Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016TRADE NEWSPAPER FEATURING AND ADVERTISING EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES RELATING TO THE TELEPHONE INDUSTRYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 11, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 10, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 27, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 27, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 27, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 15, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 2, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 2, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 1, 2011FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 24, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 24, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 11, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 11, 2011UNTDREQUEST TO DIVIDE UNTIMELY, REFUSED, OR WITHDRAWN—
May 9, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 3, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 3, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 19, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 18, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 9, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 9, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2010ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 8, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 27, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 22, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 2, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance