USPTO serial 76699199
BEER GOGGLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEER GOGGLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
HALIFAX, NOVA SCOTIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman
JONATHAN D. REICHMAN KENYON & KENYON LLPONE BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Content for mobile applications, namely, downicadable still and animated graphics, ring tones, screensavers, games and animated video clips; video game software; USB drives; mobile computers and cellular telephone accessories, namely, carrying cases, sunglasses and sunglass cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Stationery, namely, note pads, pencils; printed publications, namely, a series of fiction books and magazines featuring scenes and characters based upon video clips and video programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Bar stools; pillows | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household utensils and containers, namely, bottle openers, corkscrews, beverage containers, namely, flasks, plastic water bottles sold empty, portable insulated beverage coolers and insulated sleeve holders for beverage cups; beverage glassware; dinnerware, namely, plates, bowls, cups and mugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bedding, namely, bed sheets, bed blankets and covers, pillow cases | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, shirts, jackets, shorts, sweatshirts, boxer shorts, underwear, socks, belts, bathrobes, scarves, gloves, hats; footwear, namely, boots and shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely, action figures, stuffed toys, plush toys, board games, card games | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Brewed alcoholic beverages, namely, beer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Decode Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DHX MEDIA LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BEER GOGGLES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |