USPTO serial 76699288
VISUAL MUSIC CONCEPTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISUAL MUSIC CONCEPTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Islip, NY
West Islip, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed instructional materials for teaching music to special needs children, namely, music book featuring large print music layout; flash cards in the nature of music note cards to help reinforce note recognition; stickers for piano keys featuring large print; printed posters used to challenge and reinforce note recognition and note progression by students | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2011 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |