USPTO serial 76700162
INFOSAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITTNER, HANNO I
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INFOSAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary L. Shaffer
GARY L. SHAFFER GARY L. SHAFFER, ESQ. LLC901 BANKS PLACEALEXANDRIA, VA 22312-5507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF ORGANIZING PERSONAL AND BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUCH SERVICES FACILITATED VIA THE INTERNET OR OTHER NETWORKS, NAMELY, HOSTING ON-LINE WEB FACILITIES FOR OTHERS FOR ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING ONLINE MEETINGS, GATHERINGS AND INTERACTIVE DISCUSSIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 12, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2011 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2010 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |