USPTO serial 76704642
MOCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | MENS CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, JACKETS, T-SHIRTS, HOODED SWEATSHIRTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, POLO SHIRTS, COATS, SHORTS, PANTS, JEANS; WOMENS CLOTHING, NAMELY, SHIRTS, BLOUSES, DRESSES, SKIRTS, TUBE TOPS, JACKETS, LINGERIE, PANTIES, SHIRTS, JACKETS, COATS, T-SHIRTS, HOODED SWEATSHIRTS, SWEAT SHIRTS, TANK TOPS, POLO SHIRTS, SHORTS, PANTS, JEANS; HEADGEAR, NAMELY, CAPS, HATS AND BEANIES; FOOTWEAR, NAMELY, SHOES, SLIPPERS, BOOTS, AND SANDALS | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2011 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 31, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 24, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |