USPTO serial 76705609
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Morgan Hill, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | natural cleaning preparations and degreasing preparations specially formulated in liquid and aerosol form to meet and satisfy military and commercial specifications to remove various contaminants such as but not limited to grease, oil residues, oxidized dust, and adhesive residues on aircraft surfaces, with established channels of trade of goods limited to direct sales by applicant to highly sophisticated direct customers in the aircraft industry and through highly sophisticated distributors in the aircraft industry specially selected by applicant, said aircraft industry including both military and commercial aircraft | ACTIVE | Jan 30, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2014 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2014 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 30, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 17, 2013 | RDX2 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2013 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2012 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2010 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |