USPTO serial 76707746
HOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 19, 2013
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
New York, NY
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SANDY LIPKIN
PO BOX 3518VENTURA, CA 93006-3518UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Mar 19, 2013 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 8, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Feb 8, 2013 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | โ |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Feb 7, 2013 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| Feb 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Sep 19, 2012 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | โ |
| Sep 10, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Jun 29, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2012 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | โ |
| Jun 27, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Jun 21, 2012 | IUAL | UNTIMELY AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE PROCESSED | โ |
| Jun 21, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Jun 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 21, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Mar 8, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Feb 28, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Feb 10, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jun 7, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | โ |
| Jun 3, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | โ |