USPTO serial 76975147
HEALTHNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALTHNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Woodland Hills, CA
Woodland Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Caroline L. Keller
CAROLINE L KELLER PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP725 S FIGUEROA ST STE 2800LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5443UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | NEWSLETTERS AND MAGAZINES IN THE AREAS OF HEALTH CARE, HEALTH INFORMATION, NUTRITION, WELLNESS, MEDICINE, AND PUBLIC HEALTH | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER NETWORKS; MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF COMPUTER HARDWARE; MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, APPARATUS, AND INSTRUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | VIDEO TELECONFERENCING; PROVIDING FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT FOR VIDEO CONFERENCING; ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; E-MAIL FORWARDING SERVICES; PAGING SERVICES; SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, GRAPHICS BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE, TELEGRAPHIC, CABLE, AND SATELLITE TRANSMISSIONS; PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; VOICE MAIL SERVICES; TELEPHONE VOICE MESSAGING SERVICES; WIRELESS VOICE MAIL SERVICES; FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION; WORLDWIDE SWITCHED TEXT AND MESSAGE TRANSMISSION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE CONSULTATION; TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATABASE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Health Net, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Health Net, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HEALTHNET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |