USPTO serial 76975728
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARJORY G. BASILE
MARJORY G BASILE MILLER CANFIELD PADDOCK & STONE, PLC150 W JEFFERSON AVE STE 2500DETROIT, MI 48226UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Structural components of land vehicle exhaust systems, namely, mufflers, exhaust pipes, catalytic converters, exhaust processors, flex tubes, tubular manifolds, specialty tubing, resonators; mufflers and emission reduction units for land vehicles; cam shafts; and motorized door locks | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land vehicle ride control products, namely, shocks, struts and corner assembly units; land vehicles and structural parts for land vehicles, namely, automobiles, trucks, clutches, differentials, sun roofs, conversion roof assemblies, seats, seat assembles, wheels, window openers, windshields and windshield surrounds, sun visors, axles, transmissions, suspensions, axle shafts, axle assemblies, door assembles, brakes and their parts | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |