USPTO serial 76975786
ECO-PUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECO-PUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan S. Weinstein
JORDAN S WEINSTEIN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3454UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleaning preparations for use on carpets, clothing and other fibrous materials, automobiles, painted and other finished surfaces, and on glass; hand and skin cleaners; antimicrobial all-purpose cleaning preparations, all for household use only | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 31, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 30, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |