Drawing for CIII

USPTO serial 76976916

CIII

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIII?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William H. Cox

William H. Cox JANVEY, GORDON, HERLANDS, RANDOLPH355 LEXINGTON AVENUENew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded audio and video tapes, phonographic records, compact discs and recordings on other media featuring musical performances; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely, audio tape, video tape, compact disc, DVD and MP3 recorders and players; and eyeglass frames, sunglass frames, industrial safety eyeglass frames and opthalmic prescription eyeglass frames; goggles for scuba diving, swimming, skiing and snow boardingACTIVE—
014Watches and jewelryACTIVE—
018Luggage, Duffel Bags, All-Purpose Sports Bags, Handbags, Waist packs, Backpacks and Gym BagsACTIVE—
024Textile articles not included in other classes, namely pillow cases, pillow shams, towels, sheets, bed skirts, comforters, shower curtains, bed spreads, washcloths, dust ruffles, window curtains, draperies and bed blanketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 22, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 10, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Sep 4, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 14, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2006OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 24, 2006OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 27, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 18, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance