USPTO serial 76977087
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
92400 Courbevie, FR
92400 Courbevie, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY A. MOY
Mary A. Moy, Esq. Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrical controllers, signal processors, integrated circuits, radio signal transmitters and computer software and hardware used to automate, control and monitor operations of chemical manufacturing and processing plants; gas sensors for measuring gas concentration; fire-extinguishers; diagnostic computer software for use in remote detection and diagnosis of hazardous conditions within industrial furnaces; all of the foregoing excluding products for use in interprocess communication or for authenticating, checking, examining, reading and verifying images, marks, patterns or holograms | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Building construction and repair; installation of industrial furnaces, gas pipelines and oil, chemical and gas processing and manufacturing equipment; maintenance and cleaning of buildings; maintenance and cleaning of industrial furnaces, gas pipelines and chemical and gas processing and manufacturing equipment | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others; technical research and consultation in the field of industrial furnaces and oil, chemical and gas manufacturing and processing; engineering consultation; providing an on-line computer database in the field of industrial furnaces and chemical and gas manufacturing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 2, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |