Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76977909?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76977909. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns YANKCLOTHING?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76977909, the listed owner(s) include: FIENE, GREGG, FIENE, GREGG, SAND K, INC., G-SQUARED FASHIONS, INC..

What is USPTO serial number 76977909?

Serial number 76977909 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark YANKCLOTHING. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover YANKCLOTHING?

The public record lists International Classes: 003, 014, 018. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 76977909

YANKCLOTHING

Q: What is the current status of YANKCLOTHING?

YANKCLOTHING (76977909) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Apr 5, 2004
Status date: Feb 9, 2009
Registration date: —
Examiner: GAST, PAUL
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YANKCLOTHING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

FIENE, GREGG
Manhattan Beach, CA
Other trademarks owned by FIENE, GREGG
FIENE, GREGG
Manhattan Beach, CA
Other trademarks owned by FIENE, GREGG
SAND K, INC.
CITY OF COMMERCE, CA
Other trademarks owned by SAND K, INC.
G-SQUARED FASHIONS, INC.
LOS ANGELES, CA
Other trademarks owned by G-SQUARED FASHIONS, INC.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tal Grinblat

Tal Grinblat Lewitt, Hackman, Shapiro, Marshall & Harlan16633 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1100Encino, CA 91436UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
003	Cosmetics and all-purpose cleaning preparations	ACTIVE	—
014	Jewelry, namely, watches, bracelets, earrings, rings, pins, and hair accessories in the nature of claw clips and snap clips made of precious and semi-precious metal and precious and semi-precious stones	ACTIVE	—
018	Leather goods, namely, wallets, business, calling and credit cards cases and luggage	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Mar 18, 2009	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Mar 17, 2009	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2009	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Feb 9, 2009	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2009	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 16, 2008	EX4G	SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED	—
Jul 7, 2008	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2008	EXT4	SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED	—
May 12, 2008	EX3G	SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED	—
May 5, 2008	TPEX	SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION	—
May 5, 2008	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
May 5, 2008	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Mar 5, 2008	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2008	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 4, 2008	EXT3	SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED	—
Jul 3, 2007	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Jul 3, 2007	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Jul 3, 2007	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2006	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Dec 29, 2006	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Dec 29, 2006	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2006	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2006	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Sep 20, 2006	ASGN	AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	—
Sep 20, 2006	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
Aug 2, 2006	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jul 4, 2006	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 11, 2006	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 2006	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Feb 22, 2006	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Jan 20, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jan 17, 2006	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Jan 17, 2006	GNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Jan 17, 2006	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Jan 17, 2006	MNDA	NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED	—
Jan 13, 2006	DPCC	DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Dec 22, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Dec 12, 2005	DRRR	DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED	—
Dec 12, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Dec 12, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jun 27, 2005	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
May 12, 2005	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
May 2, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 2, 2005	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
May 2, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Oct 30, 2004	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 21, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—