CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for VERIZON WIRELESS

USPTO serial 76977945

VERIZON WIRELESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3077269Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 4, 2006
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with VERIZON WIRELESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janis M. Manning

Janis M. Manning Verizon Trademark Services LLC1320 North Court House Road, 9th FloorArlington, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications equipment, namely, telephones[; magnetically encoded prepaid telephone calling cards and credit cards]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 7, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 11, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 18, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2012NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Oct 12, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 12, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 2, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2012NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Feb 8, 2012NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Mar 14, 2011NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Jan 21, 2010NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Oct 21, 2009NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
May 15, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2009NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Jun 23, 2008NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Jun 23, 2008NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
May 29, 2008NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Apr 4, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 21, 2006REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 11, 2006CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jan 31, 2006MNDANOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED—
Jan 27, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 27, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 24, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 24, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 4, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 4, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 27, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 16, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 27, 2003ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 13, 20021.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 26, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Jul 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance