USPTO serial 76977955
JALAPENOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3669719Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 18, 2009
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JALAPENOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kay L. Schwartz
Kay L. Schwartz GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLPIP SECTION1601 Elm Street, Suite 3000Dallas, TX 75201-4761Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Watches | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 22, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 7, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |