USPTO serial 76978218
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $1,300
COOKIE JAR ENTERTAINMENT (USA) INC.
BURBANK, CA
Other trademarks owned by COOKIE JAR ENTERTAINMENT (USA) INC.
Burbank, CA
Burbank, CA
Burbank, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq.
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esq. Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP200 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10166UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | * DVDs featuring animation, music, and entertainment program for children, * video game cartridges, sunglasses | ACTIVE | Sep 6, 2005 |
| 028 | [ Dolls, doll clothing, doll accessories, and doll furniture ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | [ Providing on-line chat rooms and forums for transmission of messages among computer users concerning topic of computer gaming entertainment; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning topic of computer gaming entertainment ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing a series of animated television programs for children, providing entertainment in the field of interactive games that may be accessed by means of a global computer network, providing on-line information in the field of computer gaming entertainment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 15, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 14, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |