USPTO serial 76978553
MYPHOTOBOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEARNEY, COLLEEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYPHOTOBOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Neustadt a.d. Waldnaab, DE
Neustadt a.d. Waldnaab, DE
Weiden, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus P. Dolce
MARCUS P DOLCE PRICE HENEVELD COOPER DEWITT LITTONPO BOX 2567695 KENMOOR SEGRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501-2567Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | BOOKBINDINGS AND PARTS, NAMELY, BOOKBINDING TAPE, WIRE AND CLOTH | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2013 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2012 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | FFDM | FILING RECEIPT CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |