USPTO serial 76978628
ESILICON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 15, 2008
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ESILICON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa Greenwald Swire
Lisa Greenwald Swire Fish & Richardson P.C.PO Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cell library and components for integrated circuits or system-on-chips, namely, standard cell, mega-cell, gate array, memory compiler, variable width I/O compiler, data compiler and analog cell | ACTIVE | Feb 11, 2003 |
| 035 | Providing information about the goods and services of others via the global computer network; business services, namely, providing computer databases regarding the purchase and sale of a wide variety of products and services for others; computerized on-line retail services featuring goods in the field of semiconductor and electronics design and manufacturing; computerized online ordering services providing goods in the field of semiconductor and electronics design and manufacturing; electronic retailing services provided via a global communications network providing goods in the field of semiconductor and electronics design manufacturing; direct mail advertising; electronic billboard advertising, advertising agencies, namely, promoting the services of the semiconductor and electronics design and manufacturing industry through the distribution of printed and audio promotional materials and by rendering sales promotion advice, advertising agencies, cooperative advertising and marketing, [ dissemination of advertising matter for others, advertising services, namely, providing advertising space in a periodical, rental of advertising space, or dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network, ] advertising goods and services for others in the semiconductor and electronics design and manufacturing industry via a global computer communications network; merchandise packaging or packaging articles to the order and specification of others; providing statistical and trade information via a global computer information network | ACTIVE | Jun 13, 2000 |
| 040 | Providing services for others in the field of semiconductor and electronics design and manufacturing via a global communications network, namely, manufacturing of integrated circuits to the order and specification of others; providing services for others in the field of semiconductor and electronics design and manufacturing via a global communications network, namely, assembly of integrated circuits; providing online information, resources and searchable databases on topics in the field of semiconductor and electronics manufacturing | ACTIVE | Nov 20, 2000 |
| 042 | Providing computer software consultation; technical consultation and research in the field of semiconductor and electronics design and manufacturing; design for others in the field of semiconductor and electronics products; providing services for others in the field of semiconductor and electronics design and manufacturing via a global communications network, namely, integrated circuit design, testing and layout; providing online technical information, resources and searchable databases on topics in the field of semiconductor and electronics design; [ providing an online database of semiconductor intellectual property libraries, embedded software libraries, electronic design automation tools and technical information on semiconductor design, layout, ] testing, foundry and packaging | ACTIVE | Jun 13, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by eSilicon Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by eSilicon Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by eSilicon Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ESILICON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 25, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 18, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 11, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2007 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |