USPTO serial 76978690
CLUB V
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3362894Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2008
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLUB V?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore R. Remaklus
Theodore R. Remaklus WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, L.L.P.2700 CAREW TOWER441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-2806Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Membership club services for store customers for commercial, promotional and advertising purposes featuring promotional parties and a customer loyalty program for commercial purposes that rewards customers with gifts, discounts, and awards based, in part, on the amount and/or frequency of their purchases; and retail store services in the field of women's wearing apparel, clothing, clothing accessories, and jewelry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Value City of Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Value City of Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Value City of Michigan, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CLUB V
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 23, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |