USPTO serial 76979068
SICBRAZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3843454Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2010
- Examiner
- SPARACINO, MARK V
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SICBRAZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EADS SPACE Transportation Gmbh
D-28199 Bremen, DE
EADS SPACE Transportation Gmbh
D-28199 Bremen, DE
EADS SPACE Transportation Gmbh
D-28199 Bremen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V. T. Giordano
V T GIORDANO VON MALTITZ, DERENBERG, KUNIN, JANSSEN60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165-0006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS, AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EADS SPACE Transportation Gmbh
- Other trademarks owned by EADS SPACE Transportation Gmbh
- Other trademarks owned by EADS SPACE Transportation Gmbh
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SICBRAZE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2010 | MNDA | NOTICE OF DIVIDED TRADEMARK APPLICATION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |