USPTO serial 77001066
ARMORFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARMORFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Irving Keschner
21535 HAWTHORNE BLVD STE 385TORRANCE, CA 90503-6651UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Nylon fabric used in glove construction | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |