USPTO serial 77005784
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ginam Lee
Ginam Lee Karacter Law Firm, APLC3600 Wilshire Blvd.Suite 1510Los Angeles, CA 90010| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Eyewear; Sunglasses; Sunglass lenses; Sports' glasses; Sports eyewear; Ski glasses; Lenses for sunglasses; Frames for spectacles and sunglasses; Frames for glasses and pince-nez; Eyewear accessories, namely, straps, neck cords and head straps which restrain eyewear from movement on a wearer | ACTIVE | May 31, 1981 |
| 035 | Sales agency services for clothing; Sales agency services for sunglasses; Sales agency services for bags; Sales agency services for stationery; Sales agency services for sports goods; Sales agency services for footwear; Sales agency services for eyewear; Sales agency services for glasses; Sales agency services for cosmetics; Sales agency services for precious metals; Sales agency services for watches; Sales agency services for coffee computer electronic products; Sales agency services for cigarettes | ACTIVE | May 31, 1981 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |