USPTO serial 77008344
CAJUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAJUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Andrew Patty II
R. Andrew Patty II McGlinchey Stafford, PLLC4703 Bluebonnet BoulevardBaton Rouge, LA 70809UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Agricultural products, dairy products, forest products, manufactured goods, processed goods, packaged goods, raw foods, prepared foods, furniture, handmade craft objects, and apparel Agricultural products, namely, rice, corn, soybeans, potatoes, tomatoes, sugarcane, fruits, vegetables, seafood, fish, shellfish, aquacultural products, dairy products; forest products, namely, lumber, seed, seedlings; manufactured goods, namely, furniture, toys, jewelry, cosmetics, apparel, tools, weapons, machinery, containers; processed goods, namely, sugar, syrup, cereal, feed, cooked vegetables, pet food, alcoholic beverages, soft drinks; packaged goods, namely, cereal, seasoning, canned goods; raw foods, namely, eggs, chicken, beef, pork, mutton, sausage, seafood, fish, shellfish, aquacultural products; prepared foods, namely, baked goods, dried food, precooked meals; furniture; handmade craft objects, namely, paintings, sculptures, miniatures, dolls, emblems, flags, models, decoys; and apparel | ACTIVE | — |
| B | Professional services, namely, legal services, medical services, pharmacies, engineering, architecture, accounting, veterinary services, vocational training; personal services, namely, dietician services, consulting, haircutting, hairstyling, cosmetician services, physical training, counseling; repair services, namely, plumbing, carpentry, roofing, auto repair, computer services, shoe repair, upholstering, woodworking cabinetry, air conditioning services; construction services; design services, namely, road design and construction, bridge design and construction, levee construction and design, architecture, interior design, landscaping; merchandising services, namely, advertising, printing services, delivery services, ; apparel design services and apparel alteration services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |