USPTO serial 77008924
SOILPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOILPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Steffin
WILLIAM C STEFFIN LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP221 N FIGUEROA ST STE 1200LOS ANGELES, CA 90012-2663UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Compost | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |