USPTO serial 77014817
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary D. Krugman
GARY D. KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION, PLLC.2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | A series of pre-recorded CDs, CD-ROMs and DVDs featuring music, video games, travel guides, sight seeing guides, shopping guides, restaurant guides | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Condoms | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, post cards, posters and books in the field of illustrated books of places of interest, human beings and towns and cities, travel guides, sight seeing guides, shopping guides, restaurant guides | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, gowns, skirts, blouses, trousers, shorts, suits, beach wear, sweat bands; and outerwear, namely, sweaters, pullovers, vests, jackets, coats, raincoats, topcoats, trench coats, overalls, parkas, anoraks, wind resistant jackets, footwear, headgear, namely hats, caps, headbands, berets, bonnets, hoods | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, prepared cocoa and cocoa-based beverages; ice cream; pastries, cakes, biscuits, bonbons, candies, gummy candy; licorice, cookies, crackers; chocolates, sweets, namely, bakery desserts, dessert mousse, dessert puddings, dessert soufflés, flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts, maize-based pudding desserts, rice-based pudding desserts | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |