USPTO serial 77017796
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Waterbury, CT
MARIETTA, GA
Waterbury, CT
Waterbury, CT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric J. Hanson
Eric J. Hanson Hunton & Williams LLP600 Peachtree Street, N.E.Bank of America Plaza, Suite 4100Atlanta, GA 30308-2216| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin care products, namely, skin soaps and hand soaps in liquid and lotion forms; Antiseptic, antibacterial and antimicrobial skin soaps and hand soaps in liquid and lotion forms; Room fragrances and room fragrance refills for battery powered room fragrance dispensers; Air fragrance gels and cartridges that also provide air deodorizing, the foregoing being used in non-aerosol and battery powered dispensing units such as fan dispensing units | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 1980 |
| 005 | Air deodorizing gels and cartridges that also provide air fragrance, the foregoing being used in non-aerosol and battery powered dispensing units such as fan dispensing units; Air fresheners, air deodorizers, air odor counteractants and air sanitizers for domestic, industrial, commercial and hospital use; Sanitize conditioning cartridges for use in connection with the deodorizing, cleaning and sanitize conditioning of commodes and urinals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 1964 |
| 011 | Dispensing units for releasing fragrances, deodorizers, odor counteractants, sanitizers and fresheners into the air; Battery powered fan dispensers for dispensing air fresheners and air fragrances; Air fragrance and freshener systems, consisting primarily of battery powered fan dispensers and fragrance and freshener gels or cartridges; Plumbing fittings, namely, flush valves and sanitary conditioning systems, said systems consisting primarily of flush valves and dispensers, all for use in connection with the deodorizing, cleaning and sanitize conditioning of commodes and urinals; manual and sensor activated flushing devices for urinals and toilets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 27, 1965 |
| 021 | Soap dispensers for liquid and lotion soaps; aerosol dispensers not for medical use | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 1980 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 23, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 13, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |